Fund supervisor Neil Woodford and his firm Woodford Funding Administration are to problem the FCA’s findings on the administration of liquidity for the Woodford Fairness Revenue Fund, in response to their legal professionals.

The regulator’s findings issued at this time in a warning discover had been, “unprecedented and basically misconceived”, in response to a press release from authorized companies WilmerHale and BCLP.

The FCA printed a warning discover in opposition to Neil Woodford and Woodford Funding Administration alongside its findings in opposition to Hyperlink Fund Options.

The regulator mentioned that Mr Woodford had a “faulty and unreasonably slender understanding” of his obligations for managing liquidity dangers.

It additionally mentioned that he and Woodford Funding Administration failed to make sure that the Woodford Fairness Revenue Fund’s liquidity threat framework was applicable, to reply appropriately to the continued deterioration within the fund’s liquidity and to take care of an affordable liquidity profile for the fund.

WilmerHale and BCLP mentioned Mr Woodford and his agency will problem the FCA’s findings, claiming that the one criticisms of Mr Woodford involved the fund’s liquidity framework which was the accountability of fund administrator Hyperlink Fund Options.

The assertion additionally claimed that Woodford Funding Administration and Neil Woodford weren’t given any prior warning in regards to the fund’s suspension.

The warning notices should not the FCA’s ultimate choices. Earlier than making a ultimate resolution, Mr Woodford and Woodford Funding Administration have the precise to make representations to the FCA’s Regulatory Selections Committee.

The FCA has but to specify what, if any, regulatory motion it should take in opposition to Mr Woodford and Woodford Funding Administration ought to its ultimate resolution rule in opposition to Woodford.

The FCA mentioned it might element its proposed sanctions and its full findings public “at an applicable level.”

These invested within the Woodford Fairness Revenue Fund when it was suspended are beginning to obtain a share of a £230m redress scheme funded by the authorised company director of Hyperlink Fund Options, which was permitted by the Excessive Court docket in February.

Traders have been ready for 5 years for the redress scheme after the fund was suspended following excessive outflows in 2019.

The FCA initially calculated the losses arising from failures in liquidity administration to remaining buyers as being as much as roughly £306m.